|
|
Post by vanessajoyce on Sept 5, 2008 15:51:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by MidgardDragon on Sept 5, 2008 15:55:05 GMT -5
I'm sad. I'd be willing to give it a chance as it's one of my favorite horror movies, but everything I just read made me have virtually no faith. They're using CGI when practical effects are mostly useable, and they're deviating heavily from the first. I think it'd work better as a loose sequel to the first, or even a Poltergeist inspired movie without using the Poltergeist name, if that's the case.
|
|
|
|
Post by LuckyDawg on Sept 5, 2008 19:06:51 GMT -5
I agree with MD. Poltergeist is a classic. The original cast and director were just phenomenal.
Tobe Hooper, Jobeth Williams, Craig T. Nelson. Brilliant!
I enjoyed House of Sand and Fog, but I don't know if Vadim Perelman can pull out a spectacular remake.
I'm going to say no.
|
|
bkim
AUTO
Rabbits! Plinkety Plinkety Plink!
Posts: 271
|
Post by bkim on Sept 6, 2008 0:24:51 GMT -5
From the name of the website, I thought this would be an animated remake of Poltergeist. Man, how weird would that be?
|
|
|
|
Post by Swan on Sept 6, 2008 18:11:21 GMT -5
I'm sad. I'd be willing to give it a chance as it's one of my favorite horror movies, but everything I just read made me have virtually no faith. They're using CGI when practical effects are mostly useable, and they're deviating heavily from the first. I think it'd work better as a loose sequel to the first, or even a Poltergeist inspired movie without using the Poltergeist name, if that's the case. You'll still have the original.  |
|
|
|
Post by MidgardDragon on Sept 6, 2008 18:13:06 GMT -5
Yes, yes I will. I'd love to see this done right, though, and am not at all against a remake in general. I'm against them not doing a remake properly.  |
|
